Quantcast

A response to logan ?

Was subbed to these guys and saw them just upload this, just wanted to see what everyone thinks as they are running user requested banchmarks & show screesnshots/Provide details on everything.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

WOW right off the bat their ideas of what "could" have happened are a fucking joke. If they want to call in to question Logan's character then they should just do so. Jesus people really took that video to heart. The "variables" they bring up right off the bat NO ONE would bring up if the results were originally the other way around. I have a 2600k and am currently finishing up an x79 build, but results are results. They are basically saying Logan lied and is a fraud. Fuck them

posted 1 year 3 months ago

I just finished the whole thing, The whole Lying and is a Fraud part is wayy to much, but there Benches are pretty dam thorough , so ethically i obviously dont agree because theyre being idiotic and rude, but as they said, Science is Science.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

"If you play skyrim, you aren't a gamer because New Vegas uses more cores than skyrim."

posted 1 year 3 months ago

yeah wtf was that all about?!? ive been gaming for 15 years and i happen to love skyrim. who cares about how many cores it uses, lol. i still play a link to the past and donkey kong country and im pretty sure my 5 year old ipod is powerful enough to drive those games but that doesnt mean they arent legendary games

posted 1 year 3 months ago

God that guys hypeman behind the camera is annoying!

posted 1 year 3 months ago

LMFAO thats one of the funniest things ive ever seen

posted 1 year 3 months ago

olololololololol!

 

That was funny.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

did anyone else notice a quick jump with his head (would flash like he was looking up then go back down)

for his cinebench scores, it has a 20% increase at a 50% higher cost, seems like a pretty bad deal to me :P

 Seems like they did this in one shot with no editing, lots of pausing, things that could be cut out to create a much cleaner video (i did on par when i didnt know how to use vegas lol)

then handbrake, FX nearly beats it 20% and the FX dosent "spank it all around"... huh

 "If amd dies, intel will stop making cpu's" right...

posted 1 year 3 months ago

i think they meant stop developing new ones and just rebrand and sell at a higher price, theyre attitude towards things are pretty rude, but i ddint watch it for that, i watched and then looked at the Benchmakrs and it does bring a point of why Logans are so different.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

they seem very rude when dude said "Im a reviewer don't argue with me" WTF is that? 

posted 1 year 3 months ago

I'm curious to see how much hate will be spewed out when Logan posts the new overclocked video using the gtx670. He made a pretty bold statement on FB about it last night LOL. If these people are this worked up now, ohhh man!

 

 

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Theyll probably go red in the face and then just POP... heads gone

posted 1 year 3 months ago

  If only we could be so lucky. I’m waiting to see what Logan has to say about the next set of benchmarks for this chip and card set up and if he will make any reference to the video posted here.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

What did he say? I'm not on FB.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

This guy and his co-hort need to suck a fat one. Get off ur high horses n quit bein so butthurt Logan and friends over at TS get more exposure and bigger fan base. Jealousy is anger's ugly cousin. I sense both.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

http://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/thread/S30765217#p30765217

here is the 4chan response to his video

pretty hilarious

at the time im writing this its still going on

posted 1 year 3 months ago

LOL i was reading it and some of them think that im the one in the video.. WTF, theres is not a chance in hell im retarded enough to talk or act like that, let alone infront of a camera.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Bahamut?

posted 1 year 3 months ago

When they got to the car/truck analogy it just went full retard. compairing a v10 to a v6 sure you might have more horsepower but your horse power gets no one with out the torque. They act like they seem to know everything and have the exact same set-up as logan and wendle. its like tek syndicate for dumbasses and disbelivers

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Wow, reading that 4chan thread looks they have not made themselves any new fans.....its brutal!

Their numbers are interesting,and I thank them for taking the time to run the tests. But, its a bit rich saying "these are the benchmarks you asked for" but then not doing 8350 vs 3570k Gaming and XSplit Streaming Benchmarks?!?!??!?!?!?

Could someone repost the statement Logan made on FB about it last night, as I don't have a facebook account.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Logan:

Just finished the overclocked Intel i5 3570K VS the overclocked AMD 8350 benchmarks with an Nvidia GTX 670. Intel fans, now is the time to run down to the corner store to pick up some Haterade. You will not like these numbers.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Is that off of FB? If so i hope he did more scientific benchmarks.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Yes it is from FB.. 

Logan FB

What do you mean by more scientific? 

posted 1 year 3 months ago

A lot of people have been slamming logan for not being more scientific. The thing i would really liked answered is why the tek's benchmarks are yielding wildly different results from all the other ones? I dont think they are doctored i would just like to know how they could be so different.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Either they want the views or they are just incredibly biased.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Again... how can they be more scientific? Science is a process of repeating the tests and trying to prove the intitial results wrong. They did that, multiple times and got the results everyone is farting on.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Not sure why i wrote that its not what i meant to say. I would just like to know why logan seems to be getting much higher performances from the 8350 he is using. Look at these benchmarks from a techtuesday on reddit. http://techreport.com/review/23750/amd-fx-8350-processor-reviewed/5 http://www.techspot.com/review/608-hitman-absolution-performance-benchma...

posted 1 year 3 months ago

At the end of the video he said that he used that world record motherboard, and then talked about getting an overclock on it. I don't think he mentioned whether either of them were OC'd or not.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Gotcha... I understand what you mean now. Maybe Logan will add a couple more games to the mix in his new video.

Going by that chart there though my 2600k must be better than the 3770k... there will always be some variance but lets see what kind of shit storm follows up :)

Remember every time he tested everything in Crysis the intel won (except on xplay etc..).. so I'm sure there are certain games the amd may not really ever take a lead.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

"so I'm sure there are certain games the amd may not really ever take a lead."

And same with intel, In all the benchmarks i've seen AMD beats intel and Nvidia in Metro2033.

whether it's GPU or CPU

logans 8350 KICKED ASS over the intel. and it seems that radeon cards do better on metro than nvidia. (maybe it's FLOPS: http://teksyndicate.com/forum/gpu/gpu-flops-whats-wrong-here/129773)

Irony: doesn't metro say "optimized for nvidia" when loading up?

posted 1 year 3 months ago

No Bottlenecking GPU, More Selections of Games and Tasks, A more Standardized setup (Just to be sure) and More information as speculation because of lack of proff is what leads to other people making videos like this, theyre info was good, but the flaming part is because logan left areas without hard proof they could exploit, so hopefully he posts more info to mitigate things like this happening.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

wow this man is a kmob, He not very good at this reviewing thing.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

I stopped watching 7 minutes in. I couldn't take the stupidness anymore

posted 1 year 3 months ago

This video is quite painful to watch, his snide commentary is asinine, and the fact he has to validate himself every so often makes him lose all credibility.  In the 8350 from Tek Syndicate, he states that he will be doing more general benchmarks in another video, which should be soon.  

 

The whole "bad science" comment is laughable, as the results can be replicated.

 

Addendum: the editing was quite atrocious.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

I couldn't watch but 5 minutes of this

posted 1 year 3 months ago

to add, they never listed what they did for any of their gaming benchmarks either

posted 1 year 3 months ago

"SKYRIM AIN'T FO' GAMURS CUZ O DA COERZ!!@!@!"

 

posted 1 year 3 months ago

lelelelelelelel

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Shots Fired..! lol

posted 1 year 3 months ago

I love these guys! Freaking best comedy I've seen in a while. I love the part where they question my character. I obviously stacked the deck and cheated on the benchmarks. Yeah.... 

Seriously, the biggest problem here is that these dudes think I actually care who wins. I don't. 

I do want to thank them for spreading the word about Tek Syndicate. I wish there were more haters out there spreading the word. 

The new video is almost finished. 

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Your picture seems appropriate in this situation. Cant wait for the video. Since the other video was so controversial i would love to see more data points.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

My hero right here.

(reffering to the critter)

posted 1 year 2 months ago

This is totally awesome, I cannot believe there is already a second page worth of comments.

No good deed goes unpunished, but its not mentioned that it could get you more subscribers!

posted 1 year 3 months ago

How about you just buy it and stop whining if your so damn curious and have enough money to buy mid-high end intels and expensive video cards. Seriously people, the video was showcasing some games that obviously try to enlarge your horizon when looking for a cpu. There's loads of other reviewers on the net if you complain about biased results. Also, ts zealots are now reccomending fxs of course.

posted 1 year 3 months ago

  • The Skyrim "attack" was uncalled for. I like Skyrim more than New Vegas, because it is a better game. New Vegas might be better when it comes to CPU efficiency, but the game is boring and lackluster.

    ·
  • LavcoPriceTech

    You missed the point. Skyrim is taking a step backward in the industry, meaning that it's not a true PC gamers game. If you really cared about gaming you would not want the industry to go backward. If all you care about is console ports that look terrible and are short, why are you buying an eight core CPU?

    -Price

    · in reply to Cyberdemon531
  • Cyberdemon531

    That does not negate the fact that it is a good game. A good gamer's game, as well. Also, Skyrim does not look terrible if you mod it.

    Don't say the game is bad due to the way it is made. The content within the game can be good, even if it is wrapped in mediocrity.

    · in reply to LavcoPriceTech
  • LavcoPriceTech

    Any game will look good with mods, don't be stupid. The game is not fun, it does not help the industry. How is objectively looking at the way the game was made an invalid way of judging it?

    -Price

    · in reply to Cyberdemon531
  • Cyberdemon531

    I like how your entire shtick is "objective" this and "objective" that, and you are saying the game is not fun? That is called an opinion. You know what an opinion is, right? Subjective. I, and millions of others find the game fun. Also, not every game needs to help the industry.

    · in reply to LavcoPriceTech
  • LavcoPriceTech

    Nice appeal to authority bro. Millions of people voted for obama, does that make him the best president?

    -Price

    · in reply to Cyberdemon531
  • Cyberdemon531

    No. I never said Skyrim was the best game, either. I don't even like it that much. However, you're not "cool" or "edgy" because you don't like popular games. If millions of people like something, then that means that there is some value in it.

    · in reply to LavcoPriceTech
  • LavcoPriceTech

    You're right, I'm nott edgy, I am just a gamer. Oblivion is 5x better than skyrim.

    -Price

    · in reply to Cyberdemon531
  • Cyberdemon531

    That is all subjective. You're obviously bad at science.

    · in reply to LavcoPriceTech
  • LavcoPriceTech

    You're making an implication that I said that Skyrim is a bad game is science, I didn't imply that. You're just mad because I said baby's first elder scrolls game is bad

    -Price

  • I was making fun of what you say in the video. About how anything that you didn't do is "bad science". Also, calling me a baby? Really?

posted 1 year 3 months ago

Nice!

posted 1 year 3 months ago

o it is your first elder scrolls game. Exactly why that comment was made. The bad science is referring to fact that Logan did not provide any proof at all, just number on a screen. -Price

I played some of Morrowind before Skyrim, but that game was horrendous. I decided to give the series another shot with Skyrim, and have been playing Oblivion as well. Your comment is baseless and irrelevant.

 

posted 1 year 3 months ago

[retracted]

posted 1 year 3 months ago

 

posted 1 year 3 months ago

I... I don't even