Quantcast

Intel Nic vs Killer E2205

| posted 1 year 1 week ago

Intel Nic vs Killer E2205

Hi

 

I did research around a year ago on this matter and found that there is no difference between them in Terms of Letancy (ms,ping) in games and nothing really make a gamer go buy motherboard with killer over intel just for the killer Lan , so recently my friend telling me it does but I cant find a really convincing test or results on this

What I found so far:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7w4bsGV4Rk

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/msi_z87_xpower_review,8.html

 

So from the awesome experts of tek syndicate did you do test between these 2 ?

who give better ms/ping/latency ?

If the results not that much of big difference witch one personally you prefer to go with and why ?

 

 

sry for my awesome English , yeah i know you cant understand it much because am on an advanced level

Sign in or Register to post comments
posted 1 year 1 week ago

I would say as long as the motherboard has an intel or killer nic it does not matter  let the other features of the motherboard determine what one you get

posted 1 year 1 week ago

I already have awesome motherboard etc.. and pretty good pc overclock, but am looking into it from curiosity or just knowledge for future :D

posted 1 year 1 week ago

I have a Killer NIC 2100 standalone card that I ran with for a while, but now I stick to Intel NIC's. The "Killer technology" can smooth out network traffic that would otherwise appear jittery with other cards, but it does not lower the ping but actually raises it a little. If you have a good connection and the game server is not far away then all you need is a stable card with good drivers, with settings applied for gaming rather than running a server, and then you won't need any magic in between.

Perhaps the best thing while using the Killer NIC was when I had to have something else using bandwidth in the background while I was playing games, as it really could prioritise the games traffic. Some motherboard manufacturers have extra software now that aims to do the same, and though I doubt they are quite as good it's worth trying in any similar situation. But that's for when all the traffic comes from the one and the same system. If more than one system loads the connection then it's all up to the router to try to prioritise game packets.

Their technology works, but it isn't magic and it does not specifically lower the ping.

posted 1 year 1 week ago

that is some nice info , ye I kind already knew about that it really helps prioritisethe games traffic., but same thing cfosspeed software does witch I use and it works, the thing is they marketing and scheme is about ms and latency ,and for me that is really nice ( Using wtfast) to get right ping , because for some reason my internet provider send my data all the way thro USA while am connecting to Eu ( am in middle east) server wow and get 400ms-300ms , when use wtfast I reach 100 so it works, but I already have awesome pc not buying anything new however regarding friends and recommendation I dont advice them to buy the board just for the killer thing coz I already found it doesn't really work , i just say it is the same thing

But I cant find tests or benchmarks same for on board audio I wanted to see some testing going on with these audio chipsets like audio boost on MSI and the supreme FX on asus, Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi on gigabyte,fatal1ty Creative Sound Core3D and finally Realtek ALC1150 audio,

so Lan and onboard audio for some reason nobody do test them just like the after market coolers for gpu you dont see benchmarks between asus Gtx DcuII vs EVGA signature vs lighting msi =.=!

witch this what really matters witch after market cooler is best/ best clocked card or overclockable same goes with audio same Lan 

I just thought that wendle or Logan might have done tests to confirm if killer do improve ms/ping or if its better in anyway